Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 00:40
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Thank you.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
What’s next?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
People Are Reporting A Frightening COVID Symptom Right Now — Here's What To Know - HuffPost
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
A year later, Trump continues to appeal his historic criminal case. Here's what we know - NPR
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
This Case Forced Me to Completely Rethink How I Handle the Switch 2 - Gizmodo
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Major U.S. health insurers say they will streamline controversial process for approving care - CNBC
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Column | We asked an oncologist: Should we worry about endocrine disruptors? - The Washington Post
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.